N=1 reports: useful signal, not evidence

Personal reports are welcome here — they can surface questions worth studying. A few norms to keep them useful and compliant:

• Share observations and context, not protocols. No doses, no sources/vendors.
• Note the obvious confounders (everything else changing at once, expectation effects, time).
• Frame it as anecdote, not proof.

One person's experience is a data point of one. It can generate a hypothesis; it can't confirm one.

If a pattern keeps showing up across many reports, that's a great prompt to go check the actual literature.